Comments on: Eolas ruling affirmed http://bennett.com/blog/2005/10/eolas-ruling-affirmed/ A regular old blog Fri, 04 Sep 2009 23:51:11 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1 hourly 1 By: Richard http://bennett.com/blog/2005/10/eolas-ruling-affirmed/comment-page-1/#comment-216317 Richard Wed, 02 Nov 2005 20:52:16 +0000 http://bennett.com/blog/index.php/archives/2005/10/31/eolas-ruling-affirmed/#comment-216317 I'm saying they built Explorer to kill Netscape, but it could turn out to be an expensive murder, although I agree with you that the Eolas patent is bogus. I’m saying they built Explorer to kill Netscape, but it could turn out to be an expensive murder, although I agree with you that the Eolas patent is bogus.

]]> By: Doug Lay http://bennett.com/blog/2005/10/eolas-ruling-affirmed/comment-page-1/#comment-216261 Doug Lay Wed, 02 Nov 2005 13:06:25 +0000 http://bennett.com/blog/index.php/archives/2005/10/31/eolas-ruling-affirmed/#comment-216261 I don't get the connection. If MS had charged for Explorer, it's not like the patent wouldn't have caused them problems anyhow. MS also has the opportunity to argue the merits of the patent again in the original district court. And for a change, I'm hoping they win. There is some strong evidence of prior art which was not presented in the original trial. I don’t get the connection. If MS had charged for Explorer, it’s not like the patent wouldn’t have caused them problems anyhow.

MS also has the opportunity to argue the merits of the patent again in the original district court. And for a change, I’m hoping they win. There is some strong evidence of prior art which was not presented in the original trial.

]]>