<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Full text of COPE Act</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bennett.com/blog/2006/05/full-text-of-cope-act/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bennett.com/blog/2006/05/full-text-of-cope-act/</link>
	<description>A regular old blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 23:51:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://bennett.com/blog/2006/05/full-text-of-cope-act/comment-page-1/#comment-285741</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 May 2006 01:11:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bennett.com/blog/index.php/archives/2006/05/11/full-text-of-cope-act/#comment-285741</guid>
		<description>Try this: &quot;consumers are entitled to access the lawful Internet content of their choice &amp; consumers are entitled to run applications and use services of their choice&quot; = no blocking or filtering.

And &quot;consumers are entitled to competition among network providers, application and service providers, and content providers&quot; = no impairment or degrading.

Is this hard to follow?

Now tell me how an ISP filters spam and DOS attacks under your regulations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Try this: &#8220;consumers are entitled to access the lawful Internet content of their choice &amp; consumers are entitled to run applications and use services of their choice&#8221; = no blocking or filtering.</p>
<p>And &#8220;consumers are entitled to competition among network providers, application and service providers, and content providers&#8221; = no impairment or degrading.</p>
<p>Is this hard to follow?</p>
<p>Now tell me how an ISP filters spam and DOS attacks under your regulations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: directorblue</title>
		<link>http://bennett.com/blog/2006/05/full-text-of-cope-act/comment-page-1/#comment-285738</link>
		<dc:creator>directorblue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 May 2006 01:00:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bennett.com/blog/index.php/archives/2006/05/11/full-text-of-cope-act/#comment-285738</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s a fun game we can play.  I call it &quot;Word search on the COPE Act and related documents&quot;:

&lt;b&gt;block&lt;/b&gt; - 0 occurrences
&lt;b&gt;filter&lt;/b&gt; - 0 occurrences
&lt;b&gt;degrade&lt;/b&gt; - 0 occurrences
&lt;b&gt;impair&lt;/b&gt; - 0 occurrences

AT&amp;T&#039;s anti-net-neutrality marketing site - “…[we] will not block, impair or degrade access to any legal web site, application or service, nor will we intentionally degrade the customer experience or the service delivery of content or application providers.”

Hmmm.  I&#039;m mystified.  I would have thought I could&#039;ve found at least one of those words in the COPE Act -or- the Broadband framework.

Maybe it&#039;s just my copy, though.  I could&#039;ve sworn I was called a shameless liar for calling those terms AWOL.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a fun game we can play.  I call it &#8220;Word search on the COPE Act and related documents&#8221;:</p>
<p><b>block</b> &#8211; 0 occurrences<br />
<b>filter</b> &#8211; 0 occurrences<br />
<b>degrade</b> &#8211; 0 occurrences<br />
<b>impair</b> &#8211; 0 occurrences</p>
<p>AT&amp;T&#8217;s anti-net-neutrality marketing site &#8211; “…[we] will not block, impair or degrade access to any legal web site, application or service, nor will we intentionally degrade the customer experience or the service delivery of content or application providers.”</p>
<p>Hmmm.  I&#8217;m mystified.  I would have thought I could&#8217;ve found at least one of those words in the COPE Act -or- the Broadband framework.</p>
<p>Maybe it&#8217;s just my copy, though.  I could&#8217;ve sworn I was called a shameless liar for calling those terms AWOL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Successful Blog - Net Neutrality 5-12-2006</title>
		<link>http://bennett.com/blog/2006/05/full-text-of-cope-act/comment-page-1/#comment-284872</link>
		<dc:creator>Successful Blog - Net Neutrality 5-12-2006</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 May 2006 10:35:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bennett.com/blog/index.php/archives/2006/05/11/full-text-of-cope-act/#comment-284872</guid>
		<description>[...] Full text of COPE Act  To encourage broadband deployment and preserve and promote the open and interconnected nature of the public Internet, consumers are entitled to access the lawful Internet content of their choice. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Full text of COPE Act  To encourage broadband deployment and preserve and promote the open and interconnected nature of the public Internet, consumers are entitled to access the lawful Internet content of their choice. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.203 seconds -->
