<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Senator challenges punk to debate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bennett.com/blog/2006/07/senator-challenges-punk-to-debate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bennett.com/blog/2006/07/senator-challenges-punk-to-debate/</link>
	<description>A regular old blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 23:51:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://bennett.com/blog/2006/07/senator-challenges-punk-to-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-323705</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2006 09:52:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bennett.com/blog/index.php/archives/2006/07/28/senator-challenges-punk-to-debate/#comment-323705</guid>
		<description>Stewart isn&#039;t in the same business as Leno and Letterman, as the content of his show (the few times that I&#039;ve been able to watch it) is almost exclusively political. He&#039;s more or less a political cartoonist, while the others are general purpose entertainers. Political cartoonists are on the editorial page, where they hope to influence policy debates in one way or another. 

It&#039;s basic honesty to acknowledge that, but Stewart can&#039;t quite muster the courage to face up to what he is. Perhaps his defense is that his audience is too stoned to deal with policy in detail, so his humor is all they can handle while passing the bong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stewart isn&#8217;t in the same business as Leno and Letterman, as the content of his show (the few times that I&#8217;ve been able to watch it) is almost exclusively political. He&#8217;s more or less a political cartoonist, while the others are general purpose entertainers. Political cartoonists are on the editorial page, where they hope to influence policy debates in one way or another. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s basic honesty to acknowledge that, but Stewart can&#8217;t quite muster the courage to face up to what he is. Perhaps his defense is that his audience is too stoned to deal with policy in detail, so his humor is all they can handle while passing the bong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Aalap</title>
		<link>http://bennett.com/blog/2006/07/senator-challenges-punk-to-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-323668</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Aalap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2006 04:43:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bennett.com/blog/index.php/archives/2006/07/28/senator-challenges-punk-to-debate/#comment-323668</guid>
		<description>Is Jay Leno (or Conan O&#039;Brien, or David Letterman, or ... ) a political player on the basis that they interview politicians and criticize via humor?  I don&#039;t think The Daily Show intends to be political in a way that you appropriate to it.  It is on the Comedy Central channel and isn&#039;t meant to be consumed as political editorializing any more so than the other late night talk show hosts making fun of whomever so happens to embarrass themselves in the news.

If you can&#039;t see the humor in his depiction of Ted Stevens, then I have to wonder why you would be entertaining yourself with a comedy show.  It&#039;s supposed to be funny, no?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is Jay Leno (or Conan O&#8217;Brien, or David Letterman, or &#8230; ) a political player on the basis that they interview politicians and criticize via humor?  I don&#8217;t think The Daily Show intends to be political in a way that you appropriate to it.  It is on the Comedy Central channel and isn&#8217;t meant to be consumed as political editorializing any more so than the other late night talk show hosts making fun of whomever so happens to embarrass themselves in the news.</p>
<p>If you can&#8217;t see the humor in his depiction of Ted Stevens, then I have to wonder why you would be entertaining yourself with a comedy show.  It&#8217;s supposed to be funny, no?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://bennett.com/blog/2006/07/senator-challenges-punk-to-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-323534</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2006 20:22:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bennett.com/blog/index.php/archives/2006/07/28/senator-challenges-punk-to-debate/#comment-323534</guid>
		<description>If he were honest, I&#039;d have no complaint about him. Anybody and everybody can criticize the president of the United States without any substantial fear of reprisal, and many people do. If Stewart wants to pretend he&#039;s not a political player he should stop inviting politicians to appear on his show, and if he can&#039;t do that he should at least stop performing video fellatio on his idols among them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If he were honest, I&#8217;d have no complaint about him. Anybody and everybody can criticize the president of the United States without any substantial fear of reprisal, and many people do. If Stewart wants to pretend he&#8217;s not a political player he should stop inviting politicians to appear on his show, and if he can&#8217;t do that he should at least stop performing video fellatio on his idols among them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mumon</title>
		<link>http://bennett.com/blog/2006/07/senator-challenges-punk-to-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-323533</link>
		<dc:creator>Mumon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2006 20:14:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bennett.com/blog/index.php/archives/2006/07/28/senator-challenges-punk-to-debate/#comment-323533</guid>
		<description>Of course the role of the King&#039;s fool was to say things that the courtiers could not or would not say. 

So, no, Stewart&#039;s not a &quot;serious&quot; political comentator,  just an honest one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course the role of the King&#8217;s fool was to say things that the courtiers could not or would not say. </p>
<p>So, no, Stewart&#8217;s not a &#8220;serious&#8221; political comentator,  just an honest one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://bennett.com/blog/2006/07/senator-challenges-punk-to-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-323530</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2006 18:47:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bennett.com/blog/index.php/archives/2006/07/28/senator-challenges-punk-to-debate/#comment-323530</guid>
		<description>But Mumon, Stewart claims he&#039;s not a serious political commentator, just a comedian. That&#039;s part of his criticism of Crossfire. So how can we praise him for doing what he says he doesn&#039;t do?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But Mumon, Stewart claims he&#8217;s not a serious political commentator, just a comedian. That&#8217;s part of his criticism of Crossfire. So how can we praise him for doing what he says he doesn&#8217;t do?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.193 seconds -->
