<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Free Press continues the Scare Tactics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bennett.com/blog/2008/05/free-press-continues-the-scare-tactics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bennett.com/blog/2008/05/free-press-continues-the-scare-tactics/</link>
	<description>A regular old blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 23:51:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Richard Bennett</title>
		<link>http://bennett.com/blog/2008/05/free-press-continues-the-scare-tactics/comment-page-1/#comment-421018</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Bennett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 21:43:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bennett.com/blog/?p=4418#comment-421018</guid>
		<description>The assumption that the Internet has ever been &quot;neutral&quot; is the thing that I find the most amusing about all this. As if.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The assumption that the Internet has ever been &#8220;neutral&#8221; is the thing that I find the most amusing about all this. As if.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave McClure</title>
		<link>http://bennett.com/blog/2008/05/free-press-continues-the-scare-tactics/comment-page-1/#comment-420996</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave McClure</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 20:05:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bennett.com/blog/?p=4418#comment-420996</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the factual response.  I&#039;m afraid that my own postings on this have been less reasonable, as when I christened the whole Network Neutrality movement as a &quot;coalition of the deranged&quot; (see www.reasonedresponse.com).

Neither Free Press nor its paid puppets seem to care a whit for facts or the truth, which is why I am beginning the think that their 15 minutes of fame will soon be at an end.

Interestingly enough, the people who post to most of the tech sites (and even to free press, when their responses are not censored) do understand what is at stake in this battle, and want no part of the &quot;neutrality&quot; they offer.

Unless or until advocates can give a clear example of how the current system has failed to address legitimate needs of Internet users, the issue of &quot;network neutrality&quot; needs to be retired.

Dave McClure
www.reasonedresponse.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the factual response.  I&#8217;m afraid that my own postings on this have been less reasonable, as when I christened the whole Network Neutrality movement as a &#8220;coalition of the deranged&#8221; (see <a href="http://www.reasonedresponse.com" rel="nofollow nofollow">http://www.reasonedresponse.com</a>).</p>
<p>Neither Free Press nor its paid puppets seem to care a whit for facts or the truth, which is why I am beginning the think that their 15 minutes of fame will soon be at an end.</p>
<p>Interestingly enough, the people who post to most of the tech sites (and even to free press, when their responses are not censored) do understand what is at stake in this battle, and want no part of the &#8220;neutrality&#8221; they offer.</p>
<p>Unless or until advocates can give a clear example of how the current system has failed to address legitimate needs of Internet users, the issue of &#8220;network neutrality&#8221; needs to be retired.</p>
<p>Dave McClure<br />
<a href="http://www.reasonedresponse.com" rel="nofollow nofollow">http://www.reasonedresponse.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.188 seconds -->
