{"id":1937,"date":"2004-05-07T14:12:56","date_gmt":"2004-05-07T21:12:56","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/mossback.org\/archives\/2004\/05\/sanskrit-object-oriented\/"},"modified":"2004-05-07T14:12:56","modified_gmt":"2004-05-07T21:12:56","slug":"sanskrit-object-oriented","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/bennett.com\/blog\/2004\/05\/07\/sanskrit-object-oriented\/","title":{"rendered":"Sanskrit object-oriented"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>\t\t\t\tFrom <a title=\"Sanskrit as an Object Oriented Language | A42\" href=\"http:\/\/www.a42.com\/node\/view\/173\">Sanskrit as an Object Oriented Language:<\/a><\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>Lakshmi Thathachar&#8217;s view of Sanskrit&#8217;s nature may be paraphrased as follows: All modern languages have etymological roots in classical languages. And some say all Indo-European languages are rooted in Sanskrit, but let us not get lost in that debate. Words in Sanskrit are instances of pre-defined classes, a concept that drives object oriented programming [OOP] today. For example, in English &#8216;cow&#8217; is a just a sound assigned to mean a particular animal. But if you drill down the word &#8216;gau&#8217; &#8211;Sanskrit for &#8216;cow&#8217;&#8211; you will arrive at a broad class &#8216;gam&#8217; which means &#8216;to move. From these derive &#8216;gamanam&#8217;, &#8216;gatih&#8217; etc which are variations of &#8216;movement&#8217;. All words have this OOP approach, except that defined classes in Sanskrit are so exhaustive that they cover the material and abstract &#8211;indeed cosmic&#8211; experiences known to man. So in Sanskrit the connection is more than etymological. <\/p>\n<p>It was Panini who formalised Sanskrit&#8217;s grammar and usage about 2500 years ago. No new &#8216;classes&#8217; have needed to be added to it since then. &#8220;Panini should be thought of as the forerunner of the modern formal language theory used to specify computer languages,&#8221; say J J O&#8217;Connor and E F Robertson.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>BTW, that clown Chomsky stole his structural linguistics from Panini, and never gave him credit. Anyway, it&#8217;s an interesting article so RTWT.\t\t<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>From Sanskrit as an Object Oriented Language: Lakshmi Thathachar&#8217;s view of Sanskrit&#8217;s nature may be paraphrased as follows: All modern languages have etymological roots in classical languages. And some say all Indo-European languages are rooted in Sanskrit, but let us not get lost in that debate. Words in Sanskrit are instances of pre-defined classes, a &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/bennett.com\/blog\/2004\/05\/07\/sanskrit-object-oriented\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Sanskrit object-oriented&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1937","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-comp"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/pbifyw-vf","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/bennett.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1937","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/bennett.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/bennett.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bennett.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bennett.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1937"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/bennett.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1937\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/bennett.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1937"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bennett.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1937"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bennett.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1937"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}