{"id":2902,"date":"2004-10-06T17:02:25","date_gmt":"2004-10-07T00:02:25","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/mossback.org\/archives\/2004\/10\/lets-stop-the-draft-hoax\/"},"modified":"2004-10-06T17:02:25","modified_gmt":"2004-10-07T00:02:25","slug":"lets-stop-the-draft-hoax","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/bennett.com\/blog\/2004\/10\/06\/lets-stop-the-draft-hoax\/","title":{"rendered":"Let&#8217;s stop the draft hoax"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>\t\t\t\tIf you&#8217;re been targetted by the e-mail whispering campaign on a &#8220;secret plan to bring back the draft&#8221;, send a copy of this <a href=\"http:\/\/www.contracostatimes.com\/mld\/cctimes\/news\/9848202.htm?template=contentModules\/printstory.jsp\">story from the Contra Costa Times<\/a> to the list that your name was on: <\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>GOP sets up military draft bill to die<\/p>\n<p>By John Simerman<br \/>\nCONTRA COSTA TIMES<\/p>\n<p>House Republicans on Tuesday staged the political burial of a bill to restore the military draft, aiming to shame its Democratic sponsors and end rampant rumors of a secret post-election draft plan.<\/p>\n<p>The bill, HR163, would have required that all men and women ages 18 to 26 serve at least two years of military or civilian service &#8220;in furtherance of national defense and homeland security, and for other purposes.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Republicans brought forward the long-dormant bill Tuesday for 40 minutes of debate on the Suspension Calendar, which is intended for non-controversial items.<\/p>\n<p>Their aim, they acknowledged, was less to kill the bill than to kill widespread Internet rumors of a draft.<\/p>\n<p>The bill died, 402-2, but its fate was a side note to a debate charged with partisan bickering.<\/p>\n<p>Charles Rangel, D-N.Y., who authored the bill in January, 2003, partly to raise a public debate about the impending attack on Iraq, voted against it Tuesday.<\/p>\n<p>Rangel argued that it deserved full committee hearings and called the GOP maneuver &#8220;a disgrace.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Some Democrats said it was the first time they could remember opponents bringing a bill to the floor, rather than letting it die in committee.<\/p>\n<p>Rep. John Conyers, D-Mich., called it &#8220;a smokescreen to divert the focus from the real facts about the war in Iraq.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Republicans countered that it was the first time in memory that a bill&#8217;s sponsor complained that his intact legislation reached the House floor for a vote.<\/p>\n<p>They also blamed Democrats for fueling rumors that have spread alarm across college campuses and elsewhere.<\/p>\n<p>President Bush and Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld have both said there are no plans to restore the draft after 31 years without it.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;The reason we&#8217;re doing this is to expose the biggest hoax in show business,&#8221; said Rep. Duncan Hunter, R-San Diego, who chairs the House armed services committee.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;The hoax has been carried out through the Internet, where millions of young people are being scared by some anonymous tipster.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Majority Leader Tom DeLay called the unusual move necessary to expose &#8220;the craven partisan whisper campaign now poisoning the national debate.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>One such e-mail claims the existence of a secret plan to launch a national draft next year, and that &#8220;the administration is quietly trying to get these bills passed now, while the public&#8217;s attention is on the election.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>That doesn&#8217;t hold water, said Pat Towell, a senior fellow at the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments, a Washington-based defense think tank.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Everybody understood from the get-go that it was clearly a protest (bill),&#8221; said Towell. &#8220;There ain&#8217;t a prayer in hell it&#8217;s going to happen.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Towell said military leaders would be the first to oppose any serious talk of a draft. &#8220;The current generation of Army leaders have had a quarter-century getting used to what it&#8217;s like trying to make soldiers out of kids who want to be there,&#8221; he said.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;I suspect they would argue vehemently (against) throwing sand in the gears with kids who&#8217;d just as soon be someplace else.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Two East Bay Democrats offered differing views on the debate.<\/p>\n<p>Rep. Ellen Tauscher, D-Alamo, mocked Republicans for scheduling a vote on the bill while refusing to move her bill calling for more military manpower.<\/p>\n<p>Rep. Pete Stark, D-Fremont, one of the bill&#8217;s co-sponsors, logged one of the two yes votes. Stark said a draft would raise the stakes of the war for everyone.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;If you&#8217;re not at risk, it&#8217;s like a game,&#8221; said Stark. &#8220;The bill was (Rangel&#8217;s) concept, and it made sense for me. Nothing&#8217;s changed.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>? 2004 ContraCostaTimes.com and wire service sources. All Rights Reserved.<br \/>\nhttp:\/\/www.contracostatimes.com\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>It&#8217;s a public service.\t\t<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>If you&#8217;re been targetted by the e-mail whispering campaign on a &#8220;secret plan to bring back the draft&#8221;, send a copy of this story from the Contra Costa Times to the list that your name was on: GOP sets up military draft bill to die By John Simerman CONTRA COSTA TIMES House Republicans on Tuesday &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/bennett.com\/blog\/2004\/10\/06\/lets-stop-the-draft-hoax\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Let&#8217;s stop the draft hoax&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[16],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2902","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-politics"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/pbifyw-KO","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/bennett.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2902","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/bennett.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/bennett.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bennett.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bennett.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2902"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/bennett.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2902\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/bennett.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2902"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bennett.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2902"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bennett.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2902"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}