{"id":3172,"date":"2005-03-21T14:24:16","date_gmt":"2005-03-21T22:24:16","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/mossback.org\/index.php\/archives\/2005\/03\/21\/the-boundless-overreaching-behind-congress-new-schiavo-bill\/"},"modified":"2005-03-21T14:24:16","modified_gmt":"2005-03-21T22:24:16","slug":"the-boundless-overreaching-behind-congress-new-schiavo-bill","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/bennett.com\/blog\/2005\/03\/21\/the-boundless-overreaching-behind-congress-new-schiavo-bill\/","title":{"rendered":"The boundless overreaching behind Congress&#8217; new Schiavo bill"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>\t\t\t\t<a href=\"http:\/\/www.slate.com\/id\/2115124\/\">Dahlia Lithwick:<\/a><\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>The rule of law in this country holds that this is a federalist system &#8212; in which private domestic matters are litigated in state, not federal courts. The rule of law has long provided that such domestic decisions are generally made by competent spouses, as opposed to parents, elected officials, popular referendum, or the demands of Randall Terry. The rule of law also requires a fundamental separation of powers &#8212; in which legislatures do not override final, binding court decisions solely because the outcome is not the one they like. The rule of law requires comity between state and federal courts &#8212; wherein each respects and upholds the jurisdiction and authority of the other. The rule of law requires that we look skeptically at legislation aimed at mucking around with just one life to the exclusion of any and all similarly situated individuals.<\/p>\n<p>And what is the overwhelming constitutional value that supersedes each of these centuries-old legal notions? Evidently, Congress has a secret, super-textual constitutional role as the nation&#8217;s caped crusaders, its members authorized to leap into phone booths around the world and fly back to Washington in a single bound whenever the &#8220;culture of life&#8221; is in peril. Republicans acknowledged this weekend that their views on &#8220;the sanctity of life&#8221; trump even their convictions about federalism. Or, as Tom DeLay put it, when asked how he reconciles this bill with conservative calls to keep the federal government out of state matters, &#8220;We, as Congress, have every right to make sure that the constitutional rights of Terri Schiavo are protected, and that&#8217;s what we&#8217;re doing.&#8221;&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>The reason we have courts, the reason we traditionally assign these brutal fact-finding responsibilities to those courts, is that intimate legal custody and life-or-death decisions should not be determined based on popular referenda. They need to be rooted, as much as possible, in rock-solid legal rules.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Amen.\t\t<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Dahlia Lithwick: The rule of law in this country holds that this is a federalist system &#8212; in which private domestic matters are litigated in state, not federal courts. The rule of law has long provided that such domestic decisions are generally made by competent spouses, as opposed to parents, elected officials, popular referendum, or &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/bennett.com\/blog\/2005\/03\/21\/the-boundless-overreaching-behind-congress-new-schiavo-bill\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;The boundless overreaching behind Congress&#8217; new Schiavo bill&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[16],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3172","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-politics"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/pbifyw-Pa","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/bennett.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3172","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/bennett.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/bennett.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bennett.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bennett.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3172"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/bennett.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3172\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/bennett.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3172"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bennett.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3172"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bennett.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3172"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}