{"id":3197,"date":"2005-04-03T15:27:58","date_gmt":"2005-04-03T23:27:58","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/mossback.org\/index.php\/archives\/2005\/04\/03\/mangling-the-issue\/"},"modified":"2005-04-03T15:27:58","modified_gmt":"2005-04-03T23:27:58","slug":"mangling-the-issue","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/bennett.com\/blog\/2005\/04\/03\/mangling-the-issue\/","title":{"rendered":"Mangling the issue"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>\t\t\t\tStuart Buck attempts to re-frame the Schiavo question as one of <a href=\"http:\/\/stuartbuck.blogspot.com\/2005\/04\/competing-principles.html\">competing principles<\/a>:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\nOne of the odd things about the Schiavo affair is the argument that &#8220;if you care about federalism, you wouldn&#8217;t favor Congress&#8217;s involvement in granting federal jurisdiction for Schiavo&#8217;s parents to have one more day in federal court.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>One sees this argument in many contexts: &#8220;If you really opposed abortion, you&#8217;d support the death penalty for women who have abortions,&#8221; or &#8220;if you really wanted to clean up the environment, you&#8217;d agree to ban all automobiles,&#8221; or &#8220;if you really supported bringing democracy to Iraq, you&#8217;d support war in about 100 other countries,&#8221; or &#8220;if you really supported free speech, you wouldn&#8217;t be in favor of hate crimes laws.&#8221; In short, &#8220;If you really believed in Principle X, you&#8217;d follow that principle to all extremes without ever letting another principle override it.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>But that sort of reasoning is often wrong. People often accuse their opponents of being hypocrites when, in fact, they may simply have been <strong>balancing competing principles<\/strong>. We all do this constantly. <strong>And the mere fact that someone reaches a different balance than you, or that they decline to treat one principle alone as being absolute, does not prove that they are being hypocritical. <\/strong><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>He&#8217;s wrong, of course. This case was about three things that have nothing to do with federalism:<\/p>\n<p>1) Do we consider a person dead when their brain has stopped, even if their heart still beats? and:<\/p>\n<p>2) Do we consider it proper for legislative bodies (state or federal doesn&#8217;t matter) to attempt to make factual determinations in individual cases and craft bills that usurp judicial prerogatives; and:<\/p>\n<p>3) Do we want to litigate each end-of-life situation where a family member way wish an irrational course of action all the way to the highest court in the jurisdiction?<\/p>\n<p>Certainly, Congress was wrong to get involved in this case on federalism grounds, but that&#8217;s the least of their errors.\t\t<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Stuart Buck attempts to re-frame the Schiavo question as one of competing principles: One of the odd things about the Schiavo affair is the argument that &#8220;if you care about federalism, you wouldn&#8217;t favor Congress&#8217;s involvement in granting federal jurisdiction for Schiavo&#8217;s parents to have one more day in federal court.&#8221; One sees this argument &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/bennett.com\/blog\/2005\/04\/03\/mangling-the-issue\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Mangling the issue&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[35],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3197","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-internet"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/pbifyw-Pz","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/bennett.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3197","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/bennett.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/bennett.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bennett.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bennett.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3197"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/bennett.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3197\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/bennett.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3197"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bennett.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3197"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bennett.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3197"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}