{"id":3928,"date":"2006-06-12T17:08:40","date_gmt":"2006-06-13T00:08:40","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/bennett.com\/blog\/index.php\/archives\/2006\/06\/12\/senate-telecom-hearing\/"},"modified":"2006-06-12T17:08:40","modified_gmt":"2006-06-13T00:08:40","slug":"senate-telecom-hearing","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/bennett.com\/blog\/2006\/06\/12\/senate-telecom-hearing\/","title":{"rendered":"Senate Telecom Hearing"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>\t\t\t\tTomorrow is the hearing on the <a href=\"http:\/\/commerce.senate.gov\/public\/index.cfm?FuseAction=Hearings.Hearing&#038;Hearing_ID=1767\">telecom reform bill<\/a> in the Senate Commerce, Science, &#038; Transportation Committee. Ben Scott of <a href=\"http:\/\/freepress.net\/\">Free Press<\/a> represents the pro-regulation side of the neutrality debate, and an array of speakers on various sides of the ISP and Telco spectrum. Scott&#8217;s a good choice to speak for the neuts because he&#8217;s easily confused. Here&#8217;s some nonsense he spewed in a sound bite on <a href=\"http:\/\/www.buzzflash.com\/alerts\/06\/05\/ale06059.html\">a fictitious report<\/a> his employers released recently:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\n&#8220;The issue of Network Neutrality is about who will control the future of the Internet,&#8221; said Ben Scott, policy director of Free Press, who will testify on behalf of the consumer groups at the Senate hearing. &#8220;Will a handful of phone and cable behemoths dominate an anti-competitive marketplace and do away with the Internet as we know it? Or will consumers, content creators, educators and small businesses continue to enjoy a free, open and competitive Internet? Every major consumer organization in the country is committed to meaningful, enforceable Network Neutrality.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>The <strong>Big Lie<\/strong> here is that the COPE Act expands consumer choice, while his bill restricts it. It should be a good hearing. His organization funnels the money into the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.savetheinternet.com\/\">Save the Internet campaign<\/a>, and one of their employees, Tim Karr, runs <a href=\"http:\/\/www.savetheinternet.com\/blog\/\">their Astro-blog<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Yesterday, I happened the see a video clip from the Annual Kos event in which <a href=\"http:\/\/mydd.com\/\">Matt Stoller of MyDD<\/a> tried to make a rousing argument in favor of regulation. He had to admit that he knows nothing about the issue of Telecom policy, which was interesting because the regulations he proposes don&#8217;t actually relate to telecom policy. They&#8217;re a new and unprecedented intervention into Internet routing and service plan regulation, a totally virgin territory for government regulators. Stoller admitted that it&#8217;s just a good guys vs. bad guys issue for him, one that&#8217;s lots of &#8220;fun&#8221;. You can see the video clip at Link TV&#8217;s web site <a href=\"http:\/\/video.google.com\/videoplay?docid=5121272605131093307\">by clicking here<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>So my question is this: &#8220;should the US Congress take advice on virgin regulatory territory from someone who admits to knowing nothing about the subject matter?&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;ve got a list of questions I&#8217;d ask if I were a member the Senate panel, which I&#8217;ll post later just for fun.<\/p>\n<p>One of the more interesting things that&#8217;s come to the surface recently is that the high-profile Internet guys who are listed on the pro-regulation side have said things that indicate they&#8217;re actually opposed to the specific provisions of the Markey and Snowe-Dorgan bills. Tim Berners-Lee, for example, wrote on his blog that he believes <a href=\"http:\/\/dig.csail.mit.edu\/breadcrumbs\/node\/132\">it should be OK for ISPs to offer service plans<\/a> optimized for QoS or not:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>We may pay for a higher or a lower quality of service. We may pay for a service which has the characteristics of being good for video, or quality audio. <\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>&#8230;but these bills forbid that level of consumer choice.<\/p>\n<p>And then there&#8217;s the Vint Cerf paradox, where a guy who hasn&#8217;t worked as an actual engineer for over twenty years wants specific engineering regulations on the Internet, oh, and they just happen to benefit his current employer. He&#8217;s a Good Guy, so Matt Stoller loves him.<\/p>\n<p>See <a href=\"http:\/\/www.onlyrepublican.com\/\">Matt Sherman<\/a> for some good links on today&#8217;s news, including a story on <a href=\"http:\/\/news.com.com\/Net+neutrality+Meet+the+winner\/2008-1028_3-6082444.html?tag=nefd.lede\">News.com<\/a> and <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-dyn\/content\/article\/2006\/06\/11\/AR2006061100707.html\">an editorial<\/a> in the Washington Post.\t\t<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Tomorrow is the hearing on the telecom reform bill in the Senate Commerce, Science, &#038; Transportation Committee. Ben Scott of Free Press represents the pro-regulation side of the neutrality debate, and an array of speakers on various sides of the ISP and Telco spectrum. Scott&#8217;s a good choice to speak for the neuts because he&#8217;s &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/bennett.com\/blog\/2006\/06\/12\/senate-telecom-hearing\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Senate Telecom Hearing&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[38],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3928","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-net-neutrality"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/pbifyw-11m","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/bennett.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3928","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/bennett.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/bennett.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bennett.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bennett.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3928"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/bennett.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3928\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/bennett.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3928"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bennett.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3928"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bennett.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3928"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}