{"id":4102,"date":"2006-11-05T14:28:11","date_gmt":"2006-11-05T21:28:11","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/bennett.com\/blog\/index.php\/archives\/2006\/11\/05\/when-nunberg-attacks\/"},"modified":"2006-11-05T14:28:11","modified_gmt":"2006-11-05T21:28:11","slug":"when-nunberg-attacks","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/bennett.com\/blog\/2006\/11\/05\/when-nunberg-attacks\/","title":{"rendered":"When Nunberg attacks"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>\t\t\t\tGeoff Nunberg, the leftwing political activist and linguist who wrote <em><a href=\"http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/Talking-Right-Latte-Drinking-Volvo-Driving-Hollywood-Loving\/dp\/1586483862\/sr=1-1\/qid=1162896596\/ref=sr_1_1\/002-6327584-7232836?ie=UTF8&#038;s=books\">Talking Right: How Conservatives Turned Liberalism into a Tax-Raising, Latte-Drinking, Sushi-Eating, Volvo-Driving, New York Times-Reading, Body-Piercing, Hollywood-Loving, Left-Wing Freak Show<\/a><\/em>, is upset with me for <a href=\"http:\/\/itre.cis.upenn.edu\/~myl\/languagelog\/archives\/003738.html\">connecting George Lakoff with his former professor, Noam Chomsky:<\/a><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Many people assume that there&#8217;s some connection between Chomsky&#8217;s politics and his linguistics, and a lot of them go on to conclude that linguistics itself is constituitively a leftish discipline. So when Lakoff emerged as an influential political figure, it seemed natural to blur both his politics and his linguistics with Chomsky&#8217;s, particularly if for those who didn&#8217;t know jack about linguistics. Whatever your political views, it&#8217;s a depressing reminder of how widespread the ignorance about the field of linguistics is (not that we exactly needed another one). But then it&#8217;s probably asking too much to expect people who find it expedient to conflate Lakoff&#8217;s garden-variety liberalism with Chomsky&#8217;s anarcho-syndicalism to take the trouble to learn the difference between Chomsky&#8217;s minimalism and Lakoff&#8217;s cognitive linguistics. Oh well, they have the sense they were born with.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Please. I called Lakoff a &#8220;protege&#8221; of Chomsky&#8217;s because one of the meanings of that word is &#8220;pupil&#8221;. I&#8217;m aware that Lakoff went on to develop his own school of linguistics and a set of political beliefs that differ from Chomsky&#8217;s at the margins. But it&#8217;s impossible to ignore the fact that Chomsky was the prototype of linguist-cum-lefty-activist, and Lakoff was a student who follows in the master&#8217;s footsteps along the broad program while differing in some of the details. Nunberg follows the same (by now) well-worn path, so (naturally) he sees distinctions that don&#8217;t matter to civilians. For the record, Lakoff&#8217;s linguistics are much less loony than Chomsky&#8217;s, but that never was the issue. I&#8217;m concerned about the use of the science of linguistics to mislead voters, and on that front Chomsky and Lakoff are strongly aligned.<\/p>\n<p>UPDATE: A more accurate description of Lakoff is &#8220;Chomsky wannabe.&#8221; When you criticize linguists, be very careful about your terminology as they&#8217;ll pick you to death with meaningless distinctions.\t\t<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Geoff Nunberg, the leftwing political activist and linguist who wrote Talking Right: How Conservatives Turned Liberalism into a Tax-Raising, Latte-Drinking, Sushi-Eating, Volvo-Driving, New York Times-Reading, Body-Piercing, Hollywood-Loving, Left-Wing Freak Show, is upset with me for connecting George Lakoff with his former professor, Noam Chomsky: Many people assume that there&#8217;s some connection between Chomsky&#8217;s politics and &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/bennett.com\/blog\/2006\/11\/05\/when-nunberg-attacks\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;When Nunberg attacks&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"registered_only","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[16],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4102","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-politics"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/pbifyw-14a","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/bennett.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4102","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/bennett.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/bennett.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bennett.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bennett.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4102"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/bennett.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4102\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/bennett.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4102"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bennett.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4102"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bennett.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4102"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}