{"id":436,"date":"2002-04-11T14:06:38","date_gmt":"2002-04-11T21:06:38","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/mossback.org\/archives\/2002\/04\/under-reported-blog-traffic\/"},"modified":"2002-04-11T14:06:38","modified_gmt":"2002-04-11T21:06:38","slug":"under-reported-blog-traffic","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/bennett.com\/blog\/2002\/04\/11\/under-reported-blog-traffic\/","title":{"rendered":"Under-reported blog traffic"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>\t\t\t\t&#8212; John Scalzi (mentioned below as &#8220;some idiot&#8221;) writes in to defend his opinion that blogger stats are inflated. He&#8217;s heard of firewalls, and wrote about them in the follow-up to the blogger-bashing article cited by Rebecca Blood. But he doesn&#8217;t seem to understand how widespread firewall use is, noting &#8221; numerous small businesses don&#8217;t use firewalls.&#8221; Funny he should say that. The most popular router for small businesses is the Cisco 7200, a device that I used to write code for. The most requested feature on the 7200 was, guess what, a firewall. Nobody wants to surf the web without one, they&#8217;re even in common use in multi-computer homes, as Myria points out in her comments on my original post on this subject.<P>Scalzi also opines that AOL&#8217;s caching of popular pages doesn&#8217;t affect IP counts: &#8220;I doubt that &#8216;blog sites, typically modestly visited and with relatively few graphics, are cached frequently by AOL (I worked at AOL for<br \/>\nsome time and have some understanding of their caching criteria, so I&#8217;m not<br \/>\nentirely pulling this out of my ass.&#8221; So let&#8217;s pull some data out of our referrer logs since our asses are busy inflating our numbers. In my top ten visitors list, I find three entries that look like this: &#8220;cache-rr06.proxy.aol.com.&#8221; This looks to me like a visit from AOL&#8217;s cache server. Am I wrong? So the bottom line is this: visitor counts are depressed by proxies, firewalls, NAT boxes, and AOL cache servers. They&#8217;re inflated by the alleged practice of AOL altering IP addresses in mid-session (do they really do that? It would play hell on routing if they did &#8211; AT&#038;T Cable assigns you an IP address once and they never change it.) On the whole, these things clearly weigh in favor of depressed visitor counts, so page views is a better measure of traffic than anything else, and we don&#8217;t get page views from print because they can&#8217;t be calculated.<P>Scalzi also tells me that he&#8217;s a good buddy of war profiteer and generally disgusting sack of refuse Ted Rall. But in Scalzi&#8217;s defense, Bill Quick also says he&#8217;s a buddy of Scalzi, so the AOL man can&#8217;t be all bad. One degree of separation between Rall and Quick means we live in a strange world, but not one so strange we need it explained by the likes of Rebecca Blood, who remains firmly embedded in the clueless file.<P>Looking at <a href=\"http:\/\/scalzi.com\/w020411.htm\">Scalzi&#8217;s<\/a> and <a href=\"http:\/\/www.rebeccablood.net\/\">Blood&#8217;s<\/a> websites today, I find Scalzi saying &#8220;There is nothing more pathetic than a dad alone with his kid in the early afternoon.&#8221; and Blood calling women an &#8220;oppressed group.&#8221; I rest my case.\t\t<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>&#8212; John Scalzi (mentioned below as &#8220;some idiot&#8221;) writes in to defend his opinion that blogger stats are inflated. He&#8217;s heard of firewalls, and wrote about them in the follow-up to the blogger-bashing article cited by Rebecca Blood. But he doesn&#8217;t seem to understand how widespread firewall use is, noting &#8221; numerous small businesses don&#8217;t &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/bennett.com\/blog\/2002\/04\/11\/under-reported-blog-traffic\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Under-reported blog traffic&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-436","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-comp"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/pbifyw-72","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/bennett.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/436","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/bennett.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/bennett.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bennett.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bennett.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=436"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/bennett.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/436\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/bennett.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=436"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bennett.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=436"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bennett.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=436"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}