Environmentalist junk science kills

Daily Pundit comments on a New York Sun article on the DDT panic that’s lead to millions of perfectly preventable malaria deaths. Here’s the part that he quotes: [Pseudo]-science can be fatal. It’s estimated that since the ban of the insecticide DDT, more than 50 million people have died of malaria. A young aspiring journalist … Continue reading “Environmentalist junk science kills”

Daily Pundit comments on a New York Sun article on the DDT panic that’s lead to millions of perfectly preventable malaria deaths. Here’s the part that he quotes:

[Pseudo]-science can be fatal. It’s estimated that since the ban of the insecticide DDT, more than 50 million people have died of malaria. A young aspiring journalist from the Bulls Head section of Staten Island is one of the latest victims. Akilah Amapindi, 23, contracted the disease while working as a radio intern in southern Africa.

… DDT was not a carcinogen. It did not harm humans. Indeed, it could be ingested. It was one of the most effective killers of disease-bearing mosquitoes.

Dr. Paul Müller, its inventor, was honored with the Nobel Prize in 1948.When it was introduced in Sri Lanka, cases of malaria dropped from 3 million in 1946 to just 29 in 1964. Five years after the DDT ban, the death rate had climbed back to more than a half-million a year.

I was still a teenager when “Silent Spring”was published,and all I knew at the time was that it was about bugs, so my interest level was nonexistent. But Rachel Carson has been lauded over the years as the matriarch of today’s militant environment movement.What is interesting to note is that many legitimate scientists have always condemned her book as a tissue of cleverly told lies designed to exclude any argument that challenged Carson’s conclusions.

J.Gordon Edwards was a professor of entomology at San Jose State University who testified in defense of DDT at hearings before the ban. He wrote an editorial in 1992 for 21st Century Science and Technology Magazine that was called “The Lies of Rachel Carson.” In it he pinpointed all of Carson’s deliberate obfuscations and faulty research, from the very beginning of “Silent Spring” to its end.

… Perhaps the best explanation for why junk scientists have so much success in promoting their hokum theories is that there are so many “intellectual morons” in the world of academia. An author, Daniel Flynn, in his latest nonfiction work, “Intellectual Morons — How Ideology Makes Smart People Fall for Stupid Ideas,” coined that term.

The malaria scandal is a great example of people who mean well doing bad things because they’re too swept-up in the feeling of righteousness.

UPDATE: Commenters point out that Rachel Carson has arguably killed more people than Stalin. See the DDT FAQ here and this comment:

Communism did kill, Courtois and his fellow historians demonstrate, with ruthless efficiency: 25 million in Russia during the Bolshevik and Stalinist eras, perhaps 65 million in China under the eyes of Mao Zedong, 2 million in Cambodia, millions more Africa, Eastern Europe, and Latin America–an astonishingly high toll of victims. This freely expressed penchant for homicide, Courtois maintains, was no accident, but an integral trait of a philosophy, and a practical politics, that promised to erase class distinctions by erasing classes and the living humans that populated them.

Carson will soon catch up with Mao, the biggest mass killer of all time.

One thought on “Environmentalist junk science kills”

  1. I was at the visitor center in Yosemite Valley last week where I noticed a nice display about all of the damage done by DDT.

    I had to explain to my son that this was not a scientific statement but really a religious one.

Comments are closed.