This is a awfully funny:
You know, conservatives have lost a lot of 5-4 decisions over the past few years in the Supreme Court. Some have upset the Justices in the minority only slightly. Others, like Casey (which reaffirmed Roe on stare decisis grounds) and Stenberg (the partial-birth abortion case), have drawn eloquent and impassioned cries of anguish from the dissenters.
Why should a bare majority of Supreme Court Justices be able to dictate that women can authorize their doctors to kill their mostly-born babies by stabbing them in the skull with a pair of scissors and sucking out their brains with a suction catheter?
The solution is obvious. Let’s give Scalia a filibuster, to be used only in rare occasions where he feels very strongly about a decision.
It’s only fair.
How can anyone argue with such logic?
Is that an olive branch, Richard?
I judge every post on its merits, so if you write crap I’ll whack you and if you write wit I’ll tease you. We’re fair and balanced here at #67 in the TTLB Ecosystem.