Suppressing the Evidence

The 9/11 Commission’s attempt to suppress evidence about the Able Danger Program calls their credibility into question: Another day, another story seems to be the containment strategy for the defunct and now discredited 9/11 Commission. The AP reports that the Commission’s spokesperson, Al Felzenberg, now admits that the Commission knew full well that the secret … Continue reading “Suppressing the Evidence”

The 9/11 Commission’s attempt to suppress evidence about the Able Danger Program calls their credibility into question:

Another day, another story seems to be the containment strategy for the defunct and now discredited 9/11 Commission. The AP reports that the Commission’s spokesperson, Al Felzenberg, now admits that the Commission knew full well that the secret Army program Able Danger had identified Mohammed Atta as an al-Qaeda operative along with three other men in Brooklyn, but left it out of their final report:

This is a scandal, even bigger than the Air America scandal, and heads need to roll.

In related news, you can read Cindy Sheehan’s story in Michael Moore’s web site, where the exploitation of grieving families is the stock in trade. No, I’m not linking the scum.

2 thoughts on “Suppressing the Evidence”

  1. A far more worrisome revelation regarding Able Danger is that when the Joint Chief of Staff tried to share this information with the FBI or CIA – the lawyers prevented such a potential “invasion of privacy” risk. Sounds like the privacy advocates of the ACLU stripe would be satisfied.

Comments are closed.