The article in the New Statesman about the alliance between hard-left and hard-right forces in the anti-war movement’s getting a lot of attention today (Jarvis, Simon, Hurryup Harry, et. al.) and it’s fair reading, although a bit insular. It makes the point that the SWP/radical Islamist alliance behind the anti-war movement wasn’t reported by the … Continue reading “Saddam’s very own party”
The article in the New Statesman about the alliance between hard-left and hard-right forces in the anti-war movement’s getting a lot of attention today (Jarvis, Simon, Hurryup Harry, et. al.) and it’s fair reading, although a bit insular. It makes the point that the SWP/radical Islamist alliance behind the anti-war movement wasn’t reported by the BBC on orders from management:
The anti-war movement wasn’t a simple repetition of the old story of the politically naive being led by the nose by sly operators. The far left was becoming the far right. It had gone as close to supporting Ba’athist fascism as it dared and had formed a working alliance with the Muslim Association of Britain, which, along with the usual misogyny and homophobia of such organisations, also believed that Muslims who decided that there was no God deserved to die for the crime of free thought. In a few weeks hundreds of thousands of people, maybe millions, would allow themselves to be organised by the opponents of democracy and modernity and would march through the streets of London without a flicker of self-doubt. Wasn’t this a story?
It’s a great story, I cried. But why don’t you broadcast it?
We can’t, said the bitter hacks. Our editors won’t let us.
…and goes on to marvel about the fact that the far left has become, in effect, pro-fascist. How this transformation has come about bears some examination (Simon does his usual soul-searching on the issue), and in the end comes down to one key observation, I think: a generation ago, the left had a plausible case that socialism’s ability to manage the distribution of wealth was indispensible for the creation of just societies. But socialism, we’ve learned, can only achieve just distribution by suppressing the formation of wealth, that is, it can make us all equally poor but it can’t make us all equally rich.
On balance, the poor fare better in a free economy than in the condition of state-managed (and some would say -mandated) poverty that socialism creates. So the forces of progress have been forced to abandon socialism, leaving only a hard core behind. Fascists have always been in favor of state-run economy, so they have the core issue in common with the hard left. And this is the way it’s always been.