Saddam’s dead, Chemical Ali’s dead, coalition forces are met as liberators by cheering crowds in Basra, saran-tipped missiles are found, the INC Army is in southern Iraq, Kofi Annan says the UN shouldn’t take the lead in post-war Iraq, and the anti-war movement has shrunk to practically nothing. So the worst nightmares of the anti-war … Continue reading “Now what?”
Saddam’s dead, Chemical Ali’s dead, coalition forces are met as liberators by cheering crowds in Basra, saran-tipped missiles are found, the INC Army is in southern Iraq, Kofi Annan says the UN shouldn’t take the lead in post-war Iraq, and the anti-war movement has shrunk to practically nothing.
So the worst nightmares of the anti-war (really just anti-Bush) movement have come true: the Iraqi people wanted us to liberate them, the campaign was remarkably swift and painless, and Iraq now faces a future free of terror and fascism, and the most fierce battles of the war weren’t fought in Baghdad, but in places like San Francisco and Oakland. So what’s their excuse gonna be for valiantly trying to keep the heinous dictator in power and the people oppressed?
Some will deny it’s happening, like Al Jazeera and Saddam’s info minister; others will change the subject, like Al Sharpton and David Weinberger; and others will simply go incoherent, like the French press does in this article “Les Echos” writer Laetitia Mailhes cribbed from material she got from this blog and a phone conversation with its author, on Silicon Valley and the war:
Le debat moral difficile a trancher
Wind River Systems developpe une technologie equipant les equipements medicaux, les systemes de transport, mais aussi les reseaux de telecommunications, civils et militaires, et les systemes de guidage des missiles. Son PDG, Jerry Fiddler, un ancien militant contre la guerre du Vietnam, donnait son point de vue dans le “San Francisco Chronicle”: “La generation de mon pere a combattu dans une guerre gigantesque qui a fait enormement de victimes et cause des destructions massives. Ma generation a fait une guerre e grand renfort de bombardements, de napalm et de mines.
Aujourd’hui, nous sommes capables de mener une guerre avec des avions fantomes, des outils de telecommunications, des senseurs et un armement d’une telle precision que les degats sont limites a une zone aussi reduite que possible. La guerre est toujours detestable, mais une technologie comme la notre reduit les destructions et rend notre monde plus tolerable.”
Pacifiste de longue date, David Weinburger reconnait que le debat moral est difficile a trancher. “Premierement, indique-t-il, accepter des contrats militaires quand on est pacifiste, c’est de l’hypocrisie, mais en realite, les gens qui s’opposent a cette guerre ne sont pas necessairement pacifistes.
Deuxiemement, les scientifiques ne peuvent pas davantage esperer controler l’usage qui sera fait de leur technologie que la maniere dont leurs impots sont employes. Enfin, il est tres difficile pour une entreprise de dire : “On vous vend notre technologie a condition que vous ne l’utilisiez que pour des applications que nous approuvons…” Il ne s’agit pas d’absoudre les entreprises de toute responsabilite. Elles ont le pouvoir de decider quel monde elles veulent batir.”
Isn’t that just the silliest thing you’ve ever read, with that implication that Silicon Valley wants to restrict its products to applications that don’t involve the liberation of suffering people? Chirac’s minions will resort to some even more desperate means to try and escape accountability for the role they played in keeping Saddam in power for the last twenty years, and this is only the beginning.
Bad Google translation follows.
Continue reading “Now what?”