Scanning the four-page long account of Jayson Blair’s lies and deceptions, I can’t escape the feeling that all this hoohah over Blair on the Times’ part is misdirection. OK, the guy lied, fabricated, and plagiarized, that’s a fact and we all know it by now. But he wasn’t just some guy with a blog slinging off opinion and attitude as he saw fit, he was an employee of a major news organization with editors, publishers, and fact-checkers; why did it take four years for them to figure out what was going on, and why isn’t this question addressed by the Times?
That’s the real scandal, the fact that this sort of thing could easily happen again and again, and may well have happened in the past. It’s time the Times got with the real story and stopped all this foot-stamping hysteria already.
The media establishment has told us that responsible news organizations are more reliable than the blogs because of all these editors and fact-checkers, but who seriously believes that a blogger doing what Blair did could have survived more than a few months without being caught out? I sure don’t.
UPDATE: Drudge reports Times management is having an open forum with newsroom staff to discuss the Blair matter Wednesday:
You will be able to ask questions from the floor, or write them on cards that will be distributed at the door. In addition, we have set up an email address — [email protected] — where you can send questions, either in advance of the session or afterward.
Gee, I wonder if they’ll address questions from the general public sent to that email address?