Notes in Samsara

One of the most amusing up-and-coming left-wing blogs is Notes in Samsara, the recipient of Christian charity. It’s ranked 7000 and something in the Ecosystem, and its most authoritative inbound link is from Evangelical Outpost, a creationist site. The editor is one Mumon, who’s been described as Joe Carter’s own leftist quasi-troll. We know him … Continue reading “Notes in Samsara”

One of the most amusing up-and-coming left-wing blogs is Notes in Samsara, the recipient of Christian charity. It’s ranked 7000 and something in the Ecosystem, and its most authoritative inbound link is from Evangelical Outpost, a creationist site. The editor is one Mumon, who’s been described as Joe Carter’s own leftist quasi-troll. We know him as John K.

Instapundit on Apprentice

It hasn’t been widely reported, but Instapundit Glenn Reynolds is one of the contestants on the Donald Trump Apprentice show this season. He’s competing under the name “Danny” but as these side-by-side pictures show, Danny is none other than the famous right wing blogger who has had an abortion which he frequently talks about on … Continue reading “Instapundit on Apprentice”

It hasn’t been widely reported, but Instapundit Glenn Reynolds is one of the contestants on the Donald Trump Apprentice show this season. He’s competing under the name “Danny” but as these side-by-side pictures show, Danny is none other than the famous right wing blogger who has had an abortion which he frequently talks about on Hugh Hewitt’s Creationist Hour radio show.

.

Perfect example

This shit is a perfect example of why people trust blogs more than the Blessed Main Stream Media.

This shit is a perfect example of why people trust blogs more than the Blessed Main Stream Media.

Kos wants it both ways

Re: the Kos flap, Chris Suellentrop points out that bloggers like Kos inhabit a bit of a netherland between journalism and activism: Moulitsas is a different case. He’s never pretended to be a journalist – this past October, he told National Journal, “I am part of the media. But a journalist? No. If I had … Continue reading “Kos wants it both ways”

Re: the Kos flap, Chris Suellentrop points out that bloggers like Kos inhabit a bit of a netherland between journalism and activism:

Moulitsas is a different case. He’s never pretended to be a journalist – this past October, he told National Journal, “I am part of the media. But a journalist? No. If I had put a label on it, I would say I am an activist.” – but in the year since he stopped cashing Dean’s checks, he’s gained a reputation as “the liberal Instapundit” and the most popular left-wing blogger.

Suellentrop doesn’t quite appreciate how ambiguous Kos’ position really is. He started a bi-partisan blog in 2003 called Political State Report to cover politics at the state level leading up to the 2004 election. One of the purposes of this blog (to which I contributed for a while; see this entry commenting on one of my articles) was to obtain press credentials to cover political events such as the conventions. When this was announced, I quit and asked for my postings to be removed because it was obvious that the press role was in conflict with the activist role. I was an activist, and had been for a while, and didn’t want to try and pass myself off as anything else.

So Kos has pretty consistently leveraged his activism with consulting and journalism of a sort, no matter what he’s saying now. So regardless of how you feel about Zephyr Teachout and Jerome Armstrong, Markos Moulitsas Zuniga is a study in conflicts of interest and limited credibility.

Via Jarvis.

UPDATE: Temple Stark, current editor of Political State Report, is insistent that I mention Kos is no longer associated with Polstate, other than providing hosting for it. He doesn’t want this efforts damaged by association with Kos, and I can appreciate that.

Shady journalism

It’s hard for me to comment on this story about Iraq the Model that Jeff Jarvis writes about today without using lots of profanity to describe this Sarah Boxer character who wrote it. Suffice to say the story is factually wrong on several counts, not to mention hateful. Iraq the Model is not hosted on … Continue reading “Shady journalism”

It’s hard for me to comment on this story about Iraq the Model that Jeff Jarvis writes about today without using lots of profanity to describe this Sarah Boxer character who wrote it. Suffice to say the story is factually wrong on several counts, not to mention hateful. Iraq the Model is not hosted on a server belonging to CIA Tech Solutions and it never has been. It’s on Blogspot and always has been. Some guy associated with CIA Tech took it on himself to register some alternate domain names for a number of Iraqi blogs, including ITM and Riverbend’s, but he did so on his own and never hosted these blogs. This is explained in the comments to the Martini Republic posting that was apparently the sole source for Boxer’s article.

Sarah Boxer has just put the lives of the ITM bloggers in jeopardy on the basis of a lie. There is a special place in hell for people like her, and the sooner she finds it* the better this world will be.

(*not that I intend to send her there, mind you.)

UPDATE: Now some may argue that Boxer simply doesn’t understand the difference between a web host and a name service. If that’s the case, why did the New York Times assign her a story about a blog?

The current controversy

Another week, another blog controversy, and once again Hugh Hewitt is in the middle of it. This one deals with an alleged conflict of interest on the part of Daily Kos, and it’s been spread into the MSM by an article in the WSJ and into the nutcase media by Hugh Hewitt’s “Black Blog Ops” … Continue reading “The current controversy”

Another week, another blog controversy, and once again Hugh Hewitt is in the middle of it. This one deals with an alleged conflict of interest on the part of Daily Kos, and it’s been spread into the MSM by an article in the WSJ and into the nutcase media by Hugh Hewitt’s “Black Blog Ops” appearance on the O’Reilly show. Anybody who reads this site knows I’m anything but a fan of Markos Moulitsas Zuniga. I once contributed to a left/right blog he set up to cover the last election, but quit when I sensed it wasn’t serving my interests. Not a fan at all. That being said, the allegation that Markos’ ties to the Dean Campaign were not adequately disclosed is every bit as much a load of crap as Hewitt’s attack on the MSM for reporting on the efforts by creationists to inject religion into biology classes in Pennsylvania. Anyone who read Kos on a regular basis during the election year knew he had ties to Dean, and anyone who’s read Kos even once knows he’s a Democratic Party activist and fund raiser. Hewitt is completely off base (once again) on this controversy and he’s got no business trying to pass himself off as some sort of authority on blogs for the purpose of flogging his own book on the O’Reilly show by helping the Falafel Man trash bloggers generally. Hewitt’s popularity is a testament to the rampant stupidity in American society. He’s a man of no insight, a panderer, and a wart on our democracy.

And don’t even get me started on O’Reilly, the only man in America capable of making Air America look good. Bloggers, especially those of us in the political center and to the right, had better realize who our friends are in this world. Self-promoters like Hewitt, O’Reilly, and Armstrong Williams are not among them.

Incidentally, the attempt by the ethically-challenged former gossip columnist Chris Nolan to reduce the Kos controversy into an inside-politics conspiracy to keep Dean out the Democratic Party chairmanship is no more persuasive than another tinfoil hat theory I’ve heard that right-wingers drummed it up for a similar reason or to take the heat off Williams. Zephyr Teachout raised the issue because she thinks it has important implications for blogging, and if you look at it closely it doesn’t incriminate Kos or Dean. Her thinking was just her thinking, so if anybody looks bad it’s mainly she, not Dean, Kos, or the Party.

UPDATE: As if on cue, Zephyr digs a deeper hole for herself. What a sad case that woman is.

Van Gordon Sauter on CBS News

A former president of CBS News adds his two bits to the discussion of their credibility crisis (emphasis added): What’s the big problem at CBS News? Well, for one thing, it has no credibility. And no audience, no morale, no long-term emblematic anchorperson and no cohesive management structure. Outside of those annoyances, it shouldn’t be … Continue reading “Van Gordon Sauter on CBS News”

A former president of CBS News adds his two bits to the discussion of their credibility crisis (emphasis added):

What’s the big problem at CBS News?

Well, for one thing, it has no credibility. And no audience, no morale, no long-term emblematic anchorperson and no cohesive management structure. Outside of those annoyances, it shouldn’t be that hard to fix.

Personally, I have a great affection for CBS News, even though I was unceremoniously shown to the door there nearly 20 years ago in a tumultuous change of corporate management.

But I stopped watching it some time ago. The unremitting liberal orientation finally became too much for me. I still check in, but less and less frequently. I increasingly drift to NBC News and Fox and MSNBC.

Sour grapes from a disgruntled former employee or a unique insight from somebody in a position to know things the rest of us don’t? We report, you decide. Link via Jeff Jarvis.

And here’s Krauthammer’s take on CBS News:

This is not an isolated case. In fact the case is a perfect illustration of an utterly commonplace phenomenon: the mainstream media’s obliviousness to its own liberal bias.

I do not attribute this to bad faith. I attribute it to (as Marx would say) false consciousness — contracted by living in the liberal media cocoons of New York, Washington and Los Angeles, in which any other worldview is simply and truly inconceivable. This myopia was most perfectly captured by Pauline Kael’s famous remark after Nixon’s 1972 landslide: “I don’t know how Richard Nixon could have won. I don’t know anybody who voted for him.”

Sounds about right to this biased observer – false consciousness it is.

Blogger ethics for the rest of us

This link on Instapundit will take you to the disussion of blogger ethics inspired by the revelation that the Dean Campaign paid Daily Kos in order to increase their chances of favorable comment (see WSJ article). It’s unusual for Glenn because reader comments are enabled. Most of us are never going to be offered money … Continue reading “Blogger ethics for the rest of us”

This link on Instapundit will take you to the disussion of blogger ethics inspired by the revelation that the Dean Campaign paid Daily Kos in order to increase their chances of favorable comment (see WSJ article). It’s unusual for Glenn because reader comments are enabled.

Most of us are never going to be offered money to shill, so it’s not a terribley relevant issue across the board – even LGF guy Charles Johnson says he’s never been offered shill money – but a lot of bloggers will toe one line or another for a link or two, so maybe that’s the relevant issue. Sometimes I’ve done that, and sometimes I done the opposite, attacked somebody for the attention it draws. I suppose neither tactic is especially ethical, but the fawning probably works better, and I finally decided since I couldn’t stomach either to make a new and more obscure blog than the one I used to tend. It’s more fun this way, I can just write what I like and to hell with everybody else.

Personal animus

There is another way to look at the Rathergate story, however. While the left sees it as simply rushing a story onto the air before all the nasty details were spruced up and the right sees it as liberal bias, it can be seen, quite convincingly, as personal animosity on Rather’s part against the Bush … Continue reading “Personal animus”

There is another way to look at the Rathergate story, however. While the left sees it as simply rushing a story onto the air before all the nasty details were spruced up and the right sees it as liberal bias, it can be seen, quite convincingly, as personal animosity on Rather’s part against the Bush family, going back to Dan’s attempt to ambush Poppie Bush on Iran/Contra only to have his ass handed to him on a platter concerning his walking off the set in a snit when a football game threatened to run over into this time slot. While we can never tease these explanations apart completely, personal animus has to be at least part of the story.

That, and Dan’s just a weird bird with enough power to play out his personal problems on the air at the most critical juncture in a presidential campaign.