Amish Tech Support isn’t pleased with this year’s Bloggies, and neither am I, so let’s Boycott the Bloggies: So, what do I think? Well, first off, I think I should have just taken my nomination form, greased it with Vaseline, and shoved it up my ass for all the good it did. In a way, … Continue reading “Boycotting the Bloggies”
Amish Tech Support isn’t pleased with this year’s Bloggies, and neither am I, so let’s Boycott the Bloggies:
So, what do I think? Well, first off, I think I should have just taken my nomination form, greased it with Vaseline, and shoved it up my ass for all the good it did. In a way, this looks like a grassroots groundswell reaction against the big folks: Vodka, InstaPundit, Steven Den Beste, James Lileks. Little Green Footballs managed a political, but if mainstream even brushed against you, kiss accolades goodbye.
Yup. Awards for blogs are silly in concept, but if somebody is going to hold himself out as running an awards competition, he really has to do a better job than the bloggie people do. Their categories are silly (“Best GLBT Blog”), their nominations don’t fit their categories (Fark is a political blog? News to me), and most of the blogs that are recognized leaders, like Lawrence says, are omitted.
I really wish that somebody with the time and energy to make a go of it would run a blog awards competition with a rational nomination process, and that the people who deserve to be considered for a genuine award competition would kindly boycott the Bloggies and go for this new award instead. Call it BlogStars, since the name Bloggie is already taken by these amateurs, and set up some categories that make sense, such as best political content, best news content, best regional blog, graphic design, style (not limited to graphics), humor, insight and analysis of current events, technology, arts and literature, movies, weirdest personal diary, Mondo Bizarro, Knee-Jerk Liberal, Legal content, Academic content, that sort of thing: categories that don’t cubbyhole a writer into one and only one area, and categories that people care about instead of Best Latin American blog.
In the meanwhile, I’m boycotting the Bloggies.
UPDATE: Brian the 646 Guy was one of the randomly-selected 50 nominators who whittled the nominees’ list down to the final 4 in each category, and he’s pissed too. Here’s the list of nominees they were given, and it’s short several blogs I know were nominated.
UPDATE: Anonoblogger Centrs explained how the contest was rigged by block voting, but now doesn’t want to be quoted and has deleted her post, as a good caring person should when they’ve said too much. Here are the salient portions, posted before centrs got the call:
“the main problem? it’s rigged. the numbers are grossly skewed. i like nikolai as a person and i know that his intentions are good, but there is just no objective, scientific way for ballots to be cast. this is not even nikolai’s fault. he’s a nice enough person to trust other people to be nice too. unfortunately, they just aren’t…
…i also know that the email padding and nomination committee conspiracy is absolutely true.
for those of you with great weblogs and awesome designs that thought you might be nominated, you didn’t have a chance. you really didn’t, so don’t take it personally…
…i think we need to clarify that nikolai asked people to help him and only a handful responded. of that handful, 75% are of a group that agreed together in advance on how they would vote, actual ballots be damned. they were proud of it, bragged about it and had a good laugh at the fact that they figured out how to beat the system. a system designed by a teenager who was just trying to have some fun. it is misleading to say you only voted once when that vote carried so much weight.”
Oddly, centrs pulled the post out of concern that it was linked by “homophobic” sites, but one of the chief complainers is a gay community webzine, East West, who noticed that one of the finalists for GLBT blog is, you guessed it, straight:
A special note on this category: One of the nominees is not like the others, Min Jung Kim, put forward by some ignorant and misguided Texans as well as herself is not gay, lesbian, bisexual, or transgender, but that didn’t stop her, according to Nikolai, from pointing out a “loophole”, whatever that means, that allowed for her inclusion. By this very logic East West should be nominated for best Canadian because we eat maple syrup, love Canada, and have friends who live there. Wouldn’t that have been funny? No, not really.
You find your bigotry where you want, because East-West has some unkind things to say about Andrew Sullivan’s sexual orientation (“That Gay Jackass”, to be precise).
Meanwhile, I’ve received, from Mr. Nolan, a list of the e-mail addresses of the 50 who made the final picks, and was not surprised to see that a third were free accounts at Yahoo, Hotmail, and Netscape.
The ultimate issue here is that a group of people, [apparently from Dallas], decided to rig the contest, and the procedures set up by young Nickolai made it real easy for them to pull it off. You have to wonder about people willing to go to that much trouble to win a Wil Wheaton award.
ANOTHER UPDATE: centrs clarifies in the comments that she’s not an anonoblogger, identifies herself, and on her blog posts a detailed run-down on the cheating and the reactions to its disclosure.
She answers the question of why people would be willing to expend so much energy on this particularly lame award competition: they’re Texans. Living out there under that ferocious sun, cut off from civilization, and surrounded by ignorance, Texans are known to go loco from time to time. I know, I used to be one.
My advice to Texans who can read: get out while you still have a chance.