Why terrorists support Kerry

Some of the more delusional among us refuse to admit that the terrorists want the President to be removed from office. I know, how can I take anyone who harbors this delusion seriously — OK, I can’t. Here’s an old Krauthammer column on the subject: The terrorists’ obvious objective is to drive from power those … Continue reading “Why terrorists support Kerry”

Some of the more delusional among us refuse to admit that the terrorists want the President to be removed from office. I know, how can I take anyone who harbors this delusion seriously — OK, I can’t. Here’s an old Krauthammer column on the subject:

The terrorists’ obvious objective is to drive from power those governments most deeply involved in the war against them — in Afghanistan, Iraq or anywhere else.

But Spain and Australia — Britain, with Tony Blair up for re-election next year, will surely be next — are merely supporting actors. The real prize is America. An electoral repudiation of President Bush would be seen by the world as a repudiation of Bush’s foreign policy, specifically his aggressive, pre-emptive and often unilateral prosecution of the war on terror, most especially Iraq. It would be a correct interpretation because John Kerry has made clear that he is fighting this election on precisely those grounds.

The terrorists have no particular interest in Kerry. What they care about is Bush. He could be running against a moose, and Osama and Zarqawi would be for the moose.

How to elect the moose? A second direct attack on the United States would backfire. As 9/11 showed, attacking the American homeland would cause a rallying around the president, whoever he is. America is not Spain. Such an attack would probably result in a Bush landslide.

It is still prudent to be on high alert at home, because it is not wise to bank on the political sophistication of the enemy. The enemy is nonetheless far more likely to understand that the way to bring down Bush is not by attack at home but by debilitating guerrilla war abroad, namely in Iraq. Hence the escalation of bloodshed by Zarqawi and Co. It is not just aimed at intimidating Iraqis and preventing the Iraqi election. It is aimed at demoralizing Americans and affecting the American election.

The Islamists and Baathists in Iraq are conducting their own Tet Offensive with the same objective as the one in 1968: to demoralize the American citizenry and convince it that the war cannot be won.

It is perfectly true, as Bush critics constantly point out, that many millions around the world — from Jacques Chirac to the Arab street — dislike Bush and want to see him defeated. It is ridiculous to pretend that Osama, Zarqawi and the other barbarians are not among them.

Why else would the violence be increasing on Iraq right now?

Warum George W. Bush der bessere Pr?sident ist

Germany’s largest newspaper, Bild, has endorsed President Bush’s re-election: In sechs Tagen, am 2. November, hat Amerika die Wahl: George W. Bush oder John Kerry? Hier nennt BILD-Autor Hugo M?ller-Vogg seine zehn Gr?nde, warum es f?r Deutschland, die Welt und Amerika besser w?re, wenn George W. Bush Pr?sident bleibt*. So we have Koizumi, Putin, Curt … Continue reading “Warum George W. Bush der bessere Pr?sident ist”

Germany’s largest newspaper, Bild, has endorsed President Bush’s re-election:

In sechs Tagen, am 2. November, hat Amerika die Wahl: George W. Bush oder John Kerry? Hier nennt BILD-Autor Hugo M?ller-Vogg seine zehn Gr?nde, warum es f?r Deutschland, die Welt und Amerika besser w?re, wenn George W. Bush Pr?sident bleibt*.

So we have Koizumi, Putin, Curt Schilling, Mike Timlin, Pedro Martinez, and Germany for Bush, and Arafat and Al Qaeda for Kerry. Interesting.

*In six days, on 2 November, America has a choice: George W. Bush or John Kerry? Bild publisher Hugo Mueller Vogg lists ten reasons why it would be better for Germany, the world and America, if George W. Bush remains president.

1. Bush has clear priorities.

2. Bush has learned that military strength is the only answer to fanatics.

3. Under Bush, the US will continue to bear the financial, military and casualty burden in the fight against terrorism.

4. Bush will do everything he can to prevent nuclear proliferation.

5. Bush has learned that America can defeat every country in war, but needs allies in peace. Thus, his second term will be characterized by cooperation with international partners.

6. Bush knows Europe is militarily weak, so he won’t ask them for help.

7. Under Bush, America will remain a strong partner for Israel in its fight for survival.

8. Republicans have always been stronger supporters of free trade than Democrats.

9. Every new American administration makes mistakes. Bush has already made his.

10. With Bush, we know what to expect. With Kerry, we don’t.

via Medienkritik.

Surprise endorsement

From Power Line, an interview with Curt Schilling: GIBSON: “Well, well said, Curt and Shonda. You both have certainly lifelong membership now in the Red Sox nation. It was a great thing to watch, and I think everybody ? whether they were great Red Sox fans or not — had to admire what this team … Continue reading “Surprise endorsement”

From Power Line, an interview with Curt Schilling:

GIBSON: “Well, well said, Curt and Shonda. You both have certainly lifelong membership now in the Red Sox nation. It was a great thing to watch, and I think everybody ? whether they were great Red Sox fans or not — had to admire what this team did. It was extraordinary, and one of the great stories of sport. And sport always produces such great stories. Curt, Shonda, great to have you with us. Congratulations.”

SCHILLING: “And make sure you tell everybody to vote, and vote Bush next week.”

There you have it.

Iraqi explosives story

So CBS had planned to run the story about 380 tons of explosives missing in Iraq (out of 600,000 total) this weekend in order to sink the Bush re-elect effort, but the NY Times beat them to the punch. Unfortunately, NBC News has busted them: An NBC News crew that accompanied U.S. soldiers who seized … Continue reading “Iraqi explosives story”

So CBS had planned to run the story about 380 tons of explosives missing in Iraq (out of 600,000 total) this weekend in order to sink the Bush re-elect effort, but the NY Times beat them to the punch. Unfortunately, NBC News has busted them:

An NBC News crew that accompanied U.S. soldiers who seized the Al-Qaqaa base three weeks into the war in Iraq reported that troops discovered significant stockpiles of bombs, but no sign of the missing HMX and RDX explosives.

Reporter Lai Ling Jew, who was embedded with the Army?s 101st Airborne, Second Brigade, said Tuesday on MSNBC TV that the news team stayed at the Al-Qaqaa base for about 24 hours.

?No move to secure the weapons?
?There wasn?t a search,? she said. ?The mission that the brigade had was to get to Baghdad. That was more of a pit stop there for us. And, you know, the searching, I mean certainly some of the soldiers headed off on their own, looked through the bunkers just to look at the vast amount of ordnance lying around.

The fact that this story comes from a UN official desperate to shut down the Oil-for-Palaces scam is very disturbing, but not so disturbing that the Soros Brigade of Marshall, Brock, and Black didn’t run with it.

Reading the polls

President Bush is ahead of Kerry in the national polls right now by an average of 3.1 percent (see Real Clear Politics.) Over the past several months, his trend line is up while Kerry’s is flat (see Stephen den Beste.) Michael Barone explains why this is happening: Bush’s most effective opposition this year has come … Continue reading “Reading the polls”

President Bush is ahead of Kerry in the national polls right now by an average of 3.1 percent (see Real Clear Politics.) Over the past several months, his trend line is up while Kerry’s is flat (see Stephen den Beste.)

Michael Barone explains why this is happening:

Bush’s most effective opposition this year has come not from Kerry and the Democrats but from Old Media, the New York Times and the news pages of the Washington Post, along with the broadcast networks ABC, CBS, and NBC. Old Media gave very heavy coverage to stories that tended to hurt Bush?violence in Iraq, Abu Ghraib, the false charges of Richard Clarke and Joseph Wilson, etc. And during the first eight months of the year Bush did a poor job of making his case.

Then, suddenly, that case was made with maximum effectiveness at the Republican National Convention in New York?by John McCain and Rudolph Giuliani, by Zell Miller and Arnold Schwarzenegger, by Laura Bush and Dick Cheney and George W. Bush himself. Bush was able to get his message out unmediated by Old Media. (Fox News Channel had more viewers during the Republican National Convention than any of the old-line broadcast networks.) The message was simple: We need this president to protect the nation. Bush muffed the chance to deliver that message effectively in the first debate. But he made up for it in the second and third debates.

Kerry helped confirm the Bush message in the debates?by saying American action had to pass a global test, by saying that Saddam Hussein’s Iraq both was and was not a threat, by arguing that Saddam would “not necessarily” have remained in power if Kerry’s course had been taken. He remains the man who volunteered the words “I did actually vote for the $87 billion before I voted against it.” So in all the polls Bush continues to score better than Kerry on handling the war on terrorism and on handling Iraq.

Sounds about right, but there’s one other thing: Kerry’s messages are very appealing to the audidences for which they’re tailored, but it takes the voters a while to figure out that he’s pandering; they’ve more or less done that by now.

Best playoffs ever

If you haven’t been watching the MLB playoffs this year, I feel sorry for you. The first round (we call that the “division series”) was 100% excellent, with all the good guys defeating the bad guys (except the Yankees squeaked through, but they’re supposed to) and one full five-game series between the heroic Astros and … Continue reading “Best playoffs ever”

If you haven’t been watching the MLB playoffs this year, I feel sorry for you. The first round (we call that the “division series”) was 100% excellent, with all the good guys defeating the bad guys (except the Yankees squeaked through, but they’re supposed to) and one full five-game series between the heroic Astros and those bastards from Atlanta.

The League Championship Series has featured one great game after another, with dynamite slugging in the early games of each series followed by killer pitching in the later games. The Bostons were behind the Evil Yankees 0 games to 3 when they turned things around in a manner that would make a 12-stepper proud. They lost a game 19-8 and then came back to win three in a row after all their pitchers were hurt or shot and their most consistent hitters couldn’t find the ball. In tonight’s game in New York the umps reversed two blown calls, which has to be an even greater miracle than the Bostons rallying to tie the series at 3 games apiece. Wednesday night is the rubber match, one game to decide who represents the American League in the World Series.

Over in St. Louis, the Astros have a 3-2 game lead over the Cards in the National League Series after winning three in a row at home behind the pitchers of Christmas Past, Present, and Future and the superior closing of unhittable Brad Lidge. Houston only has to win one of the next two games, so they’re starting a rookie pitcher in order to have The Rocket on full rest for Game 7 if it happens. Carlos Beltran of the Astros is the next Barry Bonds, but without the attitude and many of the drugs, so it’s worth the price of a TV show just to see him.

Baseball is the national pastime, but it was bordering on boring until TiVo came along and rescued it, much to America’s benefit. And Japan’s too, actually. Not to mention civilization’s as a whole.

Quote of the Day

From Gen. Tommy Franks: Today we are asking our servicemen and women to do more, in more places, than we have in decades. They deserve honest, consistent, no-spin leadership that respects them, their families and their sacrifices. The war against terrorism is the right war at the right time for the right reasons. And Iraq … Continue reading “Quote of the Day”

From Gen. Tommy Franks:

Today we are asking our servicemen and women to do more, in more places, than we have in decades. They deserve honest, consistent, no-spin leadership that respects them, their families and their sacrifices. The war against terrorism is the right war at the right time for the right reasons. And Iraq is one of the places that war must be fought and won. George W. Bush has his eye on that ball and Senator John Kerry does not.

Amen.